WR · Texas
Cam Coleman
JR · 6'3", 204 lb · SEC · #8
From Phenix City, AL
NFL comparison George Pickens
Overall · Week 5
No. 6–
Wide receivers
No. 2–
Draft range
- Top 5
- 32%
- Top 15
- 89%
- Round 1
- 99%
Projected range: Picks 3–16 · 1% chance he lasts past round 1
Show as table
| Pick | Chance |
|---|---|
| 1st | 3.1% |
| 2nd | 4.9% |
| 3rd | 6.6% |
| 4th | 8.2% |
| 5th | 9.3% |
| 6th | 9.0% |
| 7th | 9.0% |
| 8th | 7.5% |
| 9th | 6.9% |
| 10th | 5.5% |
| 11th | 5.2% |
| 12th | 4.3% |
| 13th | 3.6% |
| 14th | 2.9% |
| 15th | 2.6% |
| 16th | 2.0% |
| 17th | 1.5% |
| 18th | 1.1% |
| 19th | 1.4% |
| 20th | 0.8% |
| 21st | 0.7% |
| 22nd | 0.5% |
| 23rd | 0.5% |
| 24th | 0.4% |
| 25th | 0.4% |
| 26th | 0.3% |
| 27th | 0.2% |
| 28th | 0.2% |
| 29th | 0.2% |
| 30th | 0.1% |
| 31st | 0.1% |
| 32nd | 0.1% |
Assumes he enters the 2027 draft. Based on board rank, positional value and team needs, with uncertainty that narrows as the season goes on. How this works
2026 stats
Elite receiving touchdowns among FBS wide receivers.
- Receptions1135th
- Receiving yards19455th
- Yards per reception17.685th
- Receiving touchdowns492nd
Percentiles compare him with every qualifying FBS player at his position: WR with 1.5+ catches per team game (444 players). 4 games played.
Next game
at Oklahoma
Week 6 · Sat, Oct 10 · 3:30 PM ET
Game log
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Rec | Rec yds | Y/R | Rec TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs  Texas State | W 59–7 | 3 | 70 | 23.3 | 2 |
| 2 | vs  Ohio State | W 24–23 | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 0 |
| 3 | vs  UTSA | W 30–6 | 4 | 59 | 14.8 | 2 |
| 4 | @  Tennessee | W 20–17 | 1 | 30 | 30.0 | 0 |
Rank history
Ranked No. 6 on the first board of the season. The chart fills in as the board updates each week.
Most likely landing spots
Share of simulated drafts in which each team picks him, combining every team's pick odds, needs and his projected range. He goes after round 1 in 1% of simulations.
Fit with every team
Miami Dolphins81 Excellent
Fills the Dolphins' biggest need at WR; 69% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 2–9).
Tennessee Titans69 Strong
Fills a top need for the Titans at WR; 84% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 1–5).
Washington Commanders67 Strong
Fills a top need for the Commanders at WR; 49% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 5–14).
Las Vegas Raiders66 Strong
Fills the Raiders' biggest need at WR; 25% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 10–20).
New York Jets65 Strong
WR is a moderate need for the Jets; 75% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 3–7).
Los Angeles Chargers60 Strong
WR is a moderate need for the Chargers; 63% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 3–10).
All 29 teams with a first-round pick
Arizona Cardinals60 Solid
WR is a moderate need for the Cardinals; 53% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 4–12).
Tampa Bay Buccaneers59 Solid
WR is a moderate need for the Buccaneers; 63% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 3–10).
New Orleans Saints56 Solid
WR is a moderate need for the Saints; 48% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 5–14).
Houston Texans54 Solid
WR is a moderate need for the Texans; 43% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 6–16).
New York Giants51 Solid
Fills a top need for the Giants at WR; 21% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–22).
Pittsburgh Steelers50 Solid
Fills a top need for the Steelers at WR; 20% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 12–23).
Cleveland Browns44 Fair
WR is a moderate need for the Browns; 22% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–20).
Carolina Panthers43 Fair
WR is a moderate need for the Panthers; 26% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 9–21).
Atlanta Falcons40 Fair
WR is a moderate need for the Falcons; 21% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–24).
Philadelphia Eagles40 Fair
WR is a moderate need for the Eagles; 20% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–24).
Buffalo Bills35 Fair
Fills a top need for the Bills at WR; 5% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 21–29).
Baltimore Ravens31 Fair
WR is a moderate need for the Ravens; 10% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 16–27).
Denver Broncos31 Fair
WR is a moderate need for the Broncos; 11% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 16–27).
Detroit Lions30 Fair
WR isn't a priority for the Lions; 20% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–23).
Cincinnati Bengals29 Poor
WR isn't a priority for the Bengals; 18% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 12–24).
Kansas City Chiefs25 Poor
WR is a moderate need for the Chiefs; 6% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 20–29).
Dallas Cowboys24 Poor
WR isn't a priority for the Cowboys; 11% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 14–25).
Seattle Seahawks23 Poor
WR is a moderate need for the Seahawks; 4% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 23–30).
San Francisco 49ers23 Poor
WR is a moderate need for the 49ers; 4% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 23–30).
Chicago Bears19 Poor
WR isn't a priority for the Bears; 8% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 17–27).
New England Patriots18 Poor
WR isn't a priority for the Patriots; 8% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 18–28).
Jacksonville Jaguars14 Poor
WR isn't a priority for the Jaguars; 4% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 22–30).
Minnesota Vikings3 Poor
WR isn't a priority for the Vikings; 4% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 23–30).
Fit (0–100) combines the team's need at his position (40%), how well his projected range lines up with the team's likely pick (30%) and the chance he's still available there (30%).