QB · Notre Dame
CJ Carr
SO · 6'2", 215 lb · FBS Independents · #13
From Saline, MI
NFL comparison Bo Nix
Overall · Week 5
No. 8–
Quarterbacks
No. 2–
Draft range
- Top 5
- 30%
- Top 15
- 88%
- Round 1
- 99%
Projected range: Picks 3–17 · 1% chance he lasts past round 1
Show as table
| Pick | Chance |
|---|---|
| 1st | 2.1% |
| 2nd | 4.4% |
| 3rd | 6.5% |
| 4th | 7.9% |
| 5th | 8.9% |
| 6th | 8.6% |
| 7th | 8.7% |
| 8th | 8.2% |
| 9th | 7.6% |
| 10th | 6.1% |
| 11th | 5.3% |
| 12th | 4.2% |
| 13th | 3.8% |
| 14th | 3.1% |
| 15th | 2.6% |
| 16th | 1.9% |
| 17th | 1.8% |
| 18th | 1.3% |
| 19th | 0.9% |
| 20th | 0.9% |
| 21st | 0.8% |
| 22nd | 0.5% |
| 23rd | 0.5% |
| 24th | 0.4% |
| 25th | 0.5% |
| 26th | 0.4% |
| 27th | 0.3% |
| 28th | 0.2% |
| 29th | 0.3% |
| 30th | 0.2% |
| 31st | 0.1% |
| 32nd | 0.1% |
Assumes he enters the 2027 draft. Based on board rank, positional value and team needs, with uncertainty that narrows as the season goes on. How this works
2026 stats
Elite passer efficiency rating among FBS quarterbacks.
- Passer efficiency rating185.094th
- Yards per pass attempt9.791st
- Completion percentage71.089th
- Passing yards119775th
- Passing touchdowns1391st
- Interceptions thrown1—
- Interception rate0.881st
- Rushing yards2831st
Percentiles compare him with every qualifying FBS player at his position: QB with 14+ pass attempts per team game (133 players). 5 games played.
Next game
vs Stanford
Week 6 · Sat, Oct 10 · 3:30 PM ET
Game log
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Rating | Y/A | Cmp% | Yds | TD | INT | INT% | Rush yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs  Wisconsin | W 41–13 | 157.5 | 8.2 | 65.5 | 239 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | -6 |
| 2 | vs  Rice | W 52–0 | 252.3 | 12.7 | 80.0 | 253 | 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| 3 | vs  Michigan State | W 27–10 | 156.9 | 9.8 | 75.0 | 234 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 9 |
| 4 | @  Purdue | W 49–10 | 190.0 | 10.8 | 63.6 | 237 | 3 | 1 | 4.5 | 10 |
| 5 | @  North Carolina | W 37–26 | 185.7 | 8.1 | 72.4 | 234 | 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 15 |
Rank history
Ranked No. 8 on the first board of the season. The chart fills in as the board updates each week.
Most likely landing spots
Share of simulated drafts in which each team picks him, combining every team's pick odds, needs and his projected range. He goes after round 1 in 1% of simulations.
Fit with every team
New York Jets87 Excellent
Fills the Jets' biggest need at QB; 81% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 3–7).
Arizona Cardinals82 Excellent
Fills the Cardinals' biggest need at QB; 57% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 4–12).
Miami Dolphins72 Strong
Fills a top need for the Dolphins at QB; 70% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 2–9).
Cleveland Browns66 Strong
Fills the Browns' biggest need at QB; 25% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–20).
Tennessee Titans59 Solid
QB is a moderate need for the Titans; 85% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 1–5).
Pittsburgh Steelers52 Solid
Fills a top need for the Steelers at QB; 21% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 12–23).
All 29 teams with a first-round pick
Tampa Bay Buccaneers49 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Buccaneers; 65% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 3–10).
New Orleans Saints47 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Saints; 49% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 5–14).
Houston Texans45 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Texans; 44% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 6–16).
Carolina Panthers45 Fair
QB is a moderate need for the Panthers; 27% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 9–21).
Los Angeles Chargers41 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Chargers; 65% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 3–10).
Atlanta Falcons41 Fair
QB is a moderate need for the Falcons; 22% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–24).
Washington Commanders38 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Commanders; 50% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 5–14).
New York Giants32 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Giants; 21% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–22).
Detroit Lions32 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Lions; 21% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–23).
Las Vegas Raiders27 Poor
QB isn't a priority for the Raiders; 26% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 10–20).
Minnesota Vikings24 Poor
QB is a moderate need for the Vikings; 4% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 23–30).
Philadelphia Eagles21 Poor
QB isn't a priority for the Eagles; 21% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–24).
Cincinnati Bengals20 Poor
QB isn't a priority for the Bengals; 19% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 12–24).
Dallas Cowboys16 Poor
QB isn't a priority for the Cowboys; 11% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 14–25).
Seattle Seahawks14 Poor
QB isn't a priority for the Seahawks; 4% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 23–30).
Baltimore Ravens12 Poor
QB isn't a priority for the Ravens; 12% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 16–27).
Denver Broncos12 Poor
QB isn't a priority for the Broncos; 11% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 16–27).
Chicago Bears11 Poor
QB isn't a priority for the Bears; 10% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 17–27).
New England Patriots9 Poor
QB isn't a priority for the Patriots; 9% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 18–28).
Kansas City Chiefs6 Poor
QB isn't a priority for the Chiefs; 6% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 20–29).
Buffalo Bills6 Poor
QB isn't a priority for the Bills; 6% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 21–29).
Jacksonville Jaguars4 Poor
QB isn't a priority for the Jaguars; 5% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 22–30).
San Francisco 49ers4 Poor
QB isn't a priority for the 49ers; 4% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 23–30).
Fit (0–100) combines the team's need at his position (40%), how well his projected range lines up with the team's likely pick (30%) and the chance he's still available there (30%).