

QB · Oregon
Dante Moore
JR · 6'3", 206 lb · Big Ten · #5
From Detroit, MI
NFL comparison Jared Goff
Overall · Week 5
No. 10–
Quarterbacks
No. 3–
Draft range
- Top 5
- 20%
- Top 15
- 81%
- Round 1
- 98%
Projected range: Picks 4–20 · 2% chance he lasts past round 1
Show as table
| Pick | Chance |
|---|---|
| 1st | 1.0% |
| 2nd | 2.7% |
| 3rd | 4.4% |
| 4th | 5.4% |
| 5th | 6.9% |
| 6th | 7.7% |
| 7th | 7.8% |
| 8th | 7.7% |
| 9th | 7.1% |
| 10th | 6.6% |
| 11th | 6.1% |
| 12th | 5.6% |
| 13th | 4.8% |
| 14th | 3.9% |
| 15th | 3.3% |
| 16th | 2.6% |
| 17th | 2.4% |
| 18th | 1.9% |
| 19th | 1.6% |
| 20th | 1.4% |
| 21st | 1.1% |
| 22nd | 0.9% |
| 23rd | 0.9% |
| 24th | 0.7% |
| 25th | 0.6% |
| 26th | 0.7% |
| 27th | 0.5% |
| 28th | 0.4% |
| 29th | 0.5% |
| 30th | 0.4% |
| 31st | 0.3% |
| 32nd | 0.2% |
Assumes he enters the 2027 draft. Based on board rank, positional value and team needs, with uncertainty that narrows as the season goes on. How this works
2026 stats
Elite interception rate among FBS quarterbacks.
- Passer efficiency rating178.393rd
- Yards per pass attempt9.487th
- Completion percentage69.782nd
- Passing yards92647th
- Passing touchdowns971st
- Interceptions thrown0—
- Interception rate0.096th
- Rushing yards-713th
Percentiles compare him with every qualifying FBS player at his position: QB with 14+ pass attempts per team game (133 players). 4 games played.
Next game
vs UCLA
Week 6 · Sat, Oct 10 · 3:30 PM ET
Game log
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Rating | Y/A | Cmp% | Yds | TD | INT | INT% | Rush yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs | W 34–27 | 188.2 | 10.2 | 75.7 | 378 | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | -5 |
| 2 | @ | L 31–39 | 126.4 | 6.6 | 48.3 | 191 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | -9 |
| 3 | vsPortPortland State | W 84–0 | 242.3 | 12.2 | 82.6 | 280 | 4 | 0 | 0.0 | -3 |
| 4 | @ | W 41–27 | 144.7 | 7.7 | 80.0 | 77 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 10 |
Rank history
Ranked No. 10 on the first board of the season. The chart fills in as the board updates each week.
Most likely landing spots
Share of simulated drafts in which each team picks him, combining every team's pick odds, needs and his projected range. He goes after round 1 in 2% of simulations.
Fit with every team


New York Jets84 Excellent
Fills the Jets' biggest need at QB; 86% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 3–7).


Arizona Cardinals82 Excellent
Fills the Cardinals' biggest need at QB; 63% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 4–12).


Cleveland Browns73 Strong
Fills the Browns' biggest need at QB; 32% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–20).


Miami Dolphins71 Strong
Fills a top need for the Dolphins at QB; 76% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 2–9).


Pittsburgh Steelers57 Solid
Fills a top need for the Steelers at QB; 27% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 12–23).


Tennessee Titans57 Solid
QB is a moderate need for the Titans; 89% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 1–5).
All 29 teams with a first-round pick


Carolina Panthers50 Solid
QB is a moderate need for the Panthers; 33% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 9–21).


Tampa Bay Buccaneers49 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Buccaneers; 70% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 3–10).


New Orleans Saints49 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Saints; 57% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 5–14).


Houston Texans48 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Texans; 51% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 6–16).


Atlanta Falcons47 Solid
QB is a moderate need for the Falcons; 28% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–24).


Los Angeles Chargers40 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Chargers; 71% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 3–10).


Washington Commanders40 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Commanders; 57% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 5–14).


New York Giants38 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Giants; 28% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–22).


Detroit Lions38 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Lions; 27% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–23).


Las Vegas Raiders32 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Raiders; 33% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 10–20).


Philadelphia Eagles27 Poor
QB isn't a priority for the Eagles; 27% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–24).


Minnesota Vikings27 Poor
QB is a moderate need for the Vikings; 7% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 23–30).


Cincinnati Bengals26 Poor
QB isn't a priority for the Bengals; 25% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 12–24).


Dallas Cowboys23 Poor
QB isn't a priority for the Cowboys; 17% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 14–25).


Seattle Seahawks18 Poor
QB isn't a priority for the Seahawks; 7% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 23–30).


Baltimore Ravens17 Poor
QB isn't a priority for the Ravens; 16% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 16–27).


Denver Broncos17 Poor
QB isn't a priority for the Broncos; 15% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 16–27).


Chicago Bears16 Poor
QB isn't a priority for the Bears; 14% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 17–27).


New England Patriots14 Poor
QB isn't a priority for the Patriots; 13% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 18–28).


Kansas City Chiefs10 Poor
QB isn't a priority for the Chiefs; 9% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 20–29).


Buffalo Bills10 Poor
QB isn't a priority for the Bills; 9% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 21–29).


Jacksonville Jaguars8 Poor
QB isn't a priority for the Jaguars; 8% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 22–30).


San Francisco 49ers7 Poor
QB isn't a priority for the 49ers; 6% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 23–30).
Fit (0–100) combines the team's need at his position (40%), how well his projected range lines up with the team's likely pick (30%) and the chance he's still available there (30%).