QB · Oklahoma State
Drew Mestemaker
SO · 6'3", 215 lb · Big 12 · #17
From Austin, TX
NFL comparison Jordan Love
Overall · Week 5
No. 29–
Quarterbacks
No. 6–
Draft range
- Top 5
- <1%
- Top 15
- 17%
- Round 1
- 60%
Projected range: Pick 13–Rd 2 · 40% chance he lasts past round 1
Show as table
| Pick | Chance |
|---|---|
| 3rd | <0.1% |
| 4th | 0.1% |
| 5th | 0.2% |
| 6th | 0.4% |
| 7th | 0.5% |
| 8th | 0.8% |
| 9th | 1.3% |
| 10th | 1.5% |
| 11th | 1.8% |
| 12th | 2.0% |
| 13th | 3.0% |
| 14th | 2.6% |
| 15th | 2.6% |
| 16th | 3.1% |
| 17th | 2.9% |
| 18th | 2.9% |
| 19th | 2.5% |
| 20th | 3.1% |
| 21st | 3.0% |
| 22nd | 3.1% |
| 23rd | 2.5% |
| 24th | 2.4% |
| 25th | 2.7% |
| 26th | 2.6% |
| 27th | 2.3% |
| 28th | 1.6% |
| 29th | 2.1% |
| 30th | 1.8% |
| 31st | 2.0% |
| 32nd | 1.9% |
Assumes he enters the 2027 draft. Based on board rank, positional value and team needs, with uncertainty that narrows as the season goes on. How this works
2026 stats
Above average passing yards among FBS quarterbacks.
- Passer efficiency rating161.775th
- Yards per pass attempt9.083rd
- Completion percentage67.468th
- Passing yards127183rd
- Passing touchdowns1182nd
- Interceptions thrown5—
- Interception rate3.516th
- Rushing yards10661st
Percentiles compare him with every qualifying FBS player at his position: QB with 14+ pass attempts per team game (133 players). 4 games played.
Next game
vs UCF
Week 6 · Sat, Oct 10 · 12:00 PM ET
Game log
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Rating | Y/A | Cmp% | Yds | TD | INT | INT% | Rush yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @  Tulsa | L 10–24 | 99.1 | 4.9 | 59.2 | 241 | 1 | 2 | 4.1 | 3 |
| 2 | vs  Oregon | W 39–31 | 128.4 | 7.4 | 60.5 | 317 | 2 | 2 | 4.7 | 109 |
| 3 | vsMurrMurray State | W 59–0 | 289.6 | 14.7 | 90.9 | 324 | 5 | 0 | 0.0 | -6 |
| 4 | @  West Virginia | W 41–24 | 224.4 | 14.4 | 74.1 | 389 | 3 | 1 | 3.7 | 0 |
Rank history
Ranked No. 29 on the first board of the season. The chart fills in as the board updates each week.
Most likely landing spots
Share of simulated drafts in which each team picks him, combining every team's pick odds, needs and his projected range. He goes after round 1 in 40% of simulations.
Fit with every team
Cleveland Browns85 Excellent
Fills the Browns' biggest need at QB; 84% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–20).
Arizona Cardinals75 Excellent
Fills the Cardinals' biggest need at QB; 94% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 4–12).
Pittsburgh Steelers74 Strong
Fills a top need for the Steelers at QB; 78% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 12–23).
New York Jets70 Strong
Fills the Jets' biggest need at QB; he's almost certain to be available in their most likely range (picks 3–7).
Minnesota Vikings66 Strong
QB is a moderate need for the Vikings; 57% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 23–30).
Atlanta Falcons64 Strong
QB is a moderate need for the Falcons; 77% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–24).
All 29 teams with a first-round pick
Miami Dolphins63 Strong
Fills a top need for the Dolphins at QB; 97% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 2–9).
Carolina Panthers62 Strong
QB is a moderate need for the Panthers; 81% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 9–21).
Seattle Seahawks56 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Seahawks; 57% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 23–30).
Detroit Lions54 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Lions; 78% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–23).
New York Giants54 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Giants; 78% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–22).
Tennessee Titans51 Solid
QB is a moderate need for the Titans; he's almost certain to be available in their most likely range (picks 1–5).
Houston Texans48 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Texans; 89% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 6–16).
Chicago Bears47 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Bears; 66% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 17–27).
Dallas Cowboys47 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Cowboys; 72% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 14–25).
Kansas City Chiefs47 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Chiefs; 61% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 20–29).
Buffalo Bills46 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Bills; 59% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 21–29).
Denver Broncos46 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Broncos; 67% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 16–27).
New England Patriots46 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Patriots; 64% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 18–28).
San Francisco 49ers46 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the 49ers; 56% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 23–30).
New Orleans Saints46 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Saints; 91% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 5–14).
Jacksonville Jaguars46 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Jaguars; 57% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 22–30).
Baltimore Ravens46 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Ravens; 67% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 16–27).
Cincinnati Bengals45 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Bengals; 76% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 12–24).
Philadelphia Eagles44 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Eagles; 77% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–24).
Tampa Bay Buccaneers44 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Buccaneers; 94% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 3–10).
Las Vegas Raiders43 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Raiders; 82% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 10–20).
Washington Commanders36 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Commanders; 92% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 5–14).
Los Angeles Chargers33 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Chargers; 96% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 3–10).
Fit (0–100) combines the team's need at his position (40%), how well his projected range lines up with the team's likely pick (30%) and the chance he's still available there (30%).