WR · Ohio State
Jeremiah Smith
JR · 6'4", 222 lb · Big Ten · #4
From Miami Gardens, FL
NFL comparison Julio Jones
Overall · Week 5
No. 1–
Wide receivers
No. 1–
Draft range
- Top 5
- 84%
- Top 15
- >99%
- Round 1
- >99%
Projected range: Picks 1–7
Show as table
| Pick | Chance |
|---|---|
| 1st | 35.1% |
| 2nd | 20.1% |
| 3rd | 13.2% |
| 4th | 9.3% |
| 5th | 6.4% |
| 6th | 4.7% |
| 7th | 3.4% |
| 8th | 2.5% |
| 9th | 1.6% |
| 10th | 1.1% |
| 11th | 0.7% |
| 12th | 0.7% |
| 13th | 0.4% |
| 14th | 0.3% |
| 15th | 0.2% |
| 16th | 0.1% |
| 17th | 0.1% |
| 18th | <0.1% |
| 19th | <0.1% |
| 21st | <0.1% |
| 22nd | <0.1% |
| 23rd | <0.1% |
| 24th | <0.1% |
| 26th | <0.1% |
Assumes he enters the 2027 draft. Based on board rank, positional value and team needs, with uncertainty that narrows as the season goes on. How this works
2026 stats
Elite receptions among FBS wide receivers.
- Receptions44100th
- Receiving yards823100th
- Yards per reception18.789th
- Receiving touchdowns9100th
Percentiles compare him with every qualifying FBS player at his position: WR with 1.5+ catches per team game (444 players). 5 games played.
Next game
vs Maryland
Week 6 · Sat, Oct 10 · 4:15 PM ET
Game log
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Rec | Rec yds | Y/R | Rec TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs  Ball State | W 56–3 | 8 | 151 | 18.9 | 2 |
| 2 | @  Texas | L 23–24 | 8 | 164 | 20.5 | 1 |
| 3 | vs  Kent State | W 59–3 | 5 | 85 | 17.0 | 0 |
| 4 | vs  Illinois | W 42–19 | 12 | 217 | 18.1 | 4 |
| 5 | @  Iowa | W 31–14 | 11 | 206 | 18.7 | 2 |
Rank history
Ranked No. 1 on the first board of the season. The chart fills in as the board updates each week.
Most likely landing spots
Share of simulated drafts in which each team picks him, combining every team's pick odds, needs and his projected range.
Fit with every team
Tennessee Titans74 Strong
Fills a top need for the Titans at WR; 58% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 1–5).
Miami Dolphins71 Strong
Fills the Dolphins' biggest need at WR; 35% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 2–9).
New York Jets55 Solid
WR is a moderate need for the Jets; 36% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 3–7).
Washington Commanders49 Solid
Fills a top need for the Commanders at WR; 18% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 5–14).
Tampa Bay Buccaneers48 Solid
WR is a moderate need for the Buccaneers; 31% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 3–10).
Los Angeles Chargers48 Solid
WR is a moderate need for the Chargers; 31% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 3–10).
All 29 teams with a first-round pick
Las Vegas Raiders46 Solid
Fills the Raiders' biggest need at WR; 5% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 10–20).
Arizona Cardinals41 Fair
WR is a moderate need for the Cardinals; 19% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 4–12).
New Orleans Saints39 Fair
WR is a moderate need for the Saints; 18% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 5–14).
Houston Texans35 Fair
WR is a moderate need for the Texans; 15% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 6–16).
New York Giants35 Fair
Fills a top need for the Giants at WR; 4% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–22).
Pittsburgh Steelers34 Fair
Fills a top need for the Steelers at WR; 4% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 12–23).
Buffalo Bills30 Fair
Fills a top need for the Bills at WR; he's very unlikely to last to their most likely range (picks 21–29).
Carolina Panthers27 Poor
WR is a moderate need for the Panthers; 6% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 9–21).
Atlanta Falcons25 Poor
WR is a moderate need for the Falcons; 4% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–24).
Cleveland Browns25 Poor
WR is a moderate need for the Browns; 4% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–20).
Philadelphia Eagles25 Poor
WR is a moderate need for the Eagles; 4% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–24).
Baltimore Ravens22 Poor
WR is a moderate need for the Ravens; he's very unlikely to last to their most likely range (picks 16–27).
Denver Broncos21 Poor
WR is a moderate need for the Broncos; he's very unlikely to last to their most likely range (picks 16–27).
Kansas City Chiefs20 Poor
WR is a moderate need for the Chiefs; he's very unlikely to last to their most likely range (picks 20–29).
Seattle Seahawks20 Poor
WR is a moderate need for the Seahawks; he's very unlikely to last to their most likely range (picks 23–30).
San Francisco 49ers20 Poor
WR is a moderate need for the 49ers; he's very unlikely to last to their most likely range (picks 23–30).
Detroit Lions14 Poor
WR isn't a priority for the Lions; 4% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–23).
Cincinnati Bengals14 Poor
WR isn't a priority for the Bengals; 3% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 12–24).
Dallas Cowboys11 Poor
WR isn't a priority for the Cowboys; he's very unlikely to last to their most likely range (picks 14–25).
New England Patriots11 Poor
WR isn't a priority for the Patriots; he's very unlikely to last to their most likely range (picks 18–28).
Chicago Bears11 Poor
WR isn't a priority for the Bears; he's very unlikely to last to their most likely range (picks 17–27).
Jacksonville Jaguars10 Poor
WR isn't a priority for the Jaguars; he's very unlikely to last to their most likely range (picks 22–30).
Minnesota Vikings0 Poor
WR isn't a priority for the Vikings; he's very unlikely to last to their most likely range (picks 23–30).
Fit (0–100) combines the team's need at his position (40%), how well his projected range lines up with the team's likely pick (30%) and the chance he's still available there (30%).