QB · Ohio State
Julian Sayin
JR · 6'1", 214 lb · Big Ten · #10
From Carlsbad, CA
NFL comparison Bryce Young
Overall · Week 5
No. 47–
Quarterbacks
No. 7–
Draft range
- Top 5
- <1%
- Top 15
- 3%
- Round 1
- 26%
Projected range: Pick 22–Rd 2 · 74% chance he lasts past round 1
Show as table
| Pick | Chance |
|---|---|
| 1st | <0.1% |
| 5th | <0.1% |
| 6th | <0.1% |
| 7th | <0.1% |
| 8th | 0.2% |
| 9th | 0.1% |
| 10th | 0.3% |
| 11th | 0.4% |
| 12th | 0.5% |
| 13th | 0.5% |
| 14th | 0.7% |
| 15th | 0.8% |
| 16th | 0.8% |
| 17th | 1.0% |
| 18th | 1.1% |
| 19th | 1.0% |
| 20th | 1.1% |
| 21st | 1.2% |
| 22nd | 1.1% |
| 23rd | 1.4% |
| 24th | 1.1% |
| 25th | 1.5% |
| 26th | 1.6% |
| 27th | 1.7% |
| 28th | 1.4% |
| 29th | 1.8% |
| 30th | 1.5% |
| 31st | 1.6% |
| 32nd | 1.4% |
Assumes he enters the 2027 draft. Based on board rank, positional value and team needs, with uncertainty that narrows as the season goes on. How this works
2026 stats
Elite yards per pass attempt among FBS quarterbacks.
- Passer efficiency rating191.897th
- Yards per pass attempt10.898th
- Completion percentage72.592nd
- Passing yards153097th
- Passing touchdowns1391st
- Interceptions thrown1—
- Interception rate0.785th
- Rushing yards620th
Percentiles compare him with every qualifying FBS player at his position: QB with 14+ pass attempts per team game (133 players). 5 games played.
Next game
vs Maryland
Week 6 · Sat, Oct 10 · 4:15 PM ET
Game log
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Rating | Y/A | Cmp% | Yds | TD | INT | INT% | Rush yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs  Ball State | W 56–3 | 231.1 | 12.8 | 84.0 | 320 | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | -9 |
| 2 | @  Texas | L 23–24 | 130.2 | 8.7 | 53.1 | 278 | 1 | 1 | 3.1 | -7 |
| 3 | vs  Kent State | W 59–3 | 203.8 | 11.0 | 81.8 | 241 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | -6 |
| 4 | vs  Illinois | W 42–19 | 197.3 | 10.2 | 75.0 | 367 | 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 29 |
| 5 | @  Iowa | W 31–14 | 211.5 | 12.0 | 74.1 | 324 | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | -1 |
Rank history
Ranked No. 47 on the first board of the season. The chart fills in as the board updates each week.
Most likely landing spots
Share of simulated drafts in which each team picks him, combining every team's pick odds, needs and his projected range. He goes after round 1 in 74% of simulations.
Fit with every team
Cleveland Browns74 Strong
Fills the Browns' biggest need at QB; 96% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–20).
Arizona Cardinals70 Strong
Fills the Cardinals' biggest need at QB; he's almost certain to be available in their most likely range (picks 4–12).
New York Jets70 Strong
Fills the Jets' biggest need at QB; he's almost certain to be available in their most likely range (picks 3–7).
Minnesota Vikings70 Strong
QB is a moderate need for the Vikings; 85% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 23–30).
Pittsburgh Steelers67 Strong
Fills a top need for the Steelers at QB; 94% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 12–23).
Miami Dolphins60 Strong
Fills a top need for the Dolphins at QB; he's almost certain to be available in their most likely range (picks 2–9).
All 29 teams with a first-round pick
Seattle Seahawks59 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Seahawks; 85% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 23–30).
Atlanta Falcons57 Solid
QB is a moderate need for the Falcons; 93% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–24).
Carolina Panthers56 Solid
QB is a moderate need for the Panthers; 95% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 9–21).
Tennessee Titans50 Solid
QB is a moderate need for the Titans; he's almost certain to be available in their most likely range (picks 1–5).
San Francisco 49ers50 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the 49ers; 84% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 23–30).
Jacksonville Jaguars49 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Jaguars; 85% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 22–30).
Buffalo Bills47 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Bills; 86% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 21–29).
Kansas City Chiefs47 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Chiefs; 87% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 20–29).
Detroit Lions47 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Lions; 93% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–23).
New York Giants47 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Giants; 94% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–22).
New England Patriots45 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Patriots; 88% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 18–28).
Chicago Bears43 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Bears; 89% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 17–27).
Baltimore Ravens43 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Ravens; 89% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 16–27).
Denver Broncos43 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Broncos; 89% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 16–27).
Houston Texans42 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Texans; 97% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 6–16).
New Orleans Saints42 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Saints; 97% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 5–14).
Tampa Bay Buccaneers41 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Buccaneers; he's almost certain to be available in their most likely range (picks 3–10).
Dallas Cowboys38 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Cowboys; 92% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 14–25).
Cincinnati Bengals38 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Bengals; 93% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 12–24).
Philadelphia Eagles37 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Eagles; 93% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–24).
Las Vegas Raiders35 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Raiders; 95% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 10–20).
Washington Commanders31 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Commanders; 98% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 5–14).
Los Angeles Chargers31 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Chargers; he's almost certain to be available in their most likely range (picks 3–10).
Fit (0–100) combines the team's need at his position (40%), how well his projected range lines up with the team's likely pick (30%) and the chance he's still available there (30%).