QB · South Carolina
LaNorris Sellers
JR · 6'3", 238 lb · SEC · #16
From Florence, SC
Overall · Week 5
No. 58–
Quarterbacks
No. 9–
Draft range
- Top 5
- <1%
- Top 15
- 1%
- Round 1
- 13%
Projected range: Pick 29–Rd 2 · 87% chance he lasts past round 1
Show as table
| Pick | Chance |
|---|---|
| 5th | <0.1% |
| 8th | <0.1% |
| 9th | <0.1% |
| 10th | <0.1% |
| 11th | <0.1% |
| 12th | 0.2% |
| 13th | 0.2% |
| 14th | 0.2% |
| 15th | 0.3% |
| 16th | 0.4% |
| 17th | 0.5% |
| 18th | 0.5% |
| 19th | 0.5% |
| 20th | 0.7% |
| 21st | 0.6% |
| 22nd | 0.6% |
| 23rd | 0.6% |
| 24th | 0.5% |
| 25th | 0.9% |
| 26th | 1.1% |
| 27th | 0.8% |
| 28th | 0.9% |
| 29th | 1.1% |
| 30th | 0.9% |
| 31st | 1.0% |
| 32nd | 0.9% |
Assumes he enters the 2027 draft. Based on board rank, positional value and team needs, with uncertainty that narrows as the season goes on. How this works
2026 stats
Elite rushing yards among FBS quarterbacks.
- Passer efficiency rating131.229th
- Yards per pass attempt7.029th
- Completion percentage60.530th
- Passing yards105960th
- Passing touchdowns863rd
- Interceptions thrown4—
- Interception rate2.635th
- Rushing yards39198th
Percentiles compare him with every qualifying FBS player at his position: QB with 14+ pass attempts per team game (133 players). 5 games played.
Next game
at Florida
Week 6 · Sat, Oct 10 · 12:45 PM ET
Game log
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Rating | Y/A | Cmp% | Yds | TD | INT | INT% | Rush yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs  Kent State | W 57–0 | 224.3 | 11.7 | 82.6 | 270 | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 |
| 2 | vsTowsTowson | W 45–9 | 69.8 | 4.2 | 43.5 | 96 | 0 | 1 | 4.3 | 119 |
| 3 | vs  Mississippi State | L 34–41 | 128.2 | 7.0 | 62.5 | 282 | 2 | 2 | 5.0 | 52 |
| 4 | @  Alabama | L 18–49 | 116.1 | 6.2 | 60.0 | 185 | 1 | 1 | 3.3 | 72 |
| 5 | vs  Kentucky | L 34–35 | 126.6 | 6.3 | 55.6 | 226 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 147 |
Rank history
Ranked No. 58 on the first board of the season. The chart fills in as the board updates each week.
Most likely landing spots
Share of simulated drafts in which each team picks him, combining every team's pick odds, needs and his projected range. He goes after round 1 in 87% of simulations.
Fit with every team
Cleveland Browns70 Strong
Fills the Browns' biggest need at QB; he's almost certain to be available in their most likely range (picks 11–20).
Arizona Cardinals70 Strong
Fills the Cardinals' biggest need at QB; he's almost certain to be available in their most likely range (picks 4–12).
New York Jets70 Strong
Fills the Jets' biggest need at QB; he's almost certain to be available in their most likely range (picks 3–7).
Pittsburgh Steelers62 Strong
Fills a top need for the Steelers at QB; 97% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 12–23).
Miami Dolphins60 Strong
Fills a top need for the Dolphins at QB; he's almost certain to be available in their most likely range (picks 2–9).
Minnesota Vikings58 Solid
QB is a moderate need for the Vikings; 93% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 23–30).
All 29 teams with a first-round pick
Atlanta Falcons52 Solid
QB is a moderate need for the Falcons; 97% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–24).
Carolina Panthers51 Solid
QB is a moderate need for the Panthers; 98% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 9–21).
Tennessee Titans50 Solid
QB is a moderate need for the Titans; he's almost certain to be available in their most likely range (picks 1–5).
Seattle Seahawks49 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Seahawks; 92% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 23–30).
Detroit Lions42 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Lions; 97% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–23).
New York Giants41 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Giants; 97% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–22).
Houston Texans41 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Texans; he's almost certain to be available in their most likely range (picks 6–16).
New Orleans Saints40 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Saints; he's almost certain to be available in their most likely range (picks 5–14).
Tampa Bay Buccaneers40 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Buccaneers; he's almost certain to be available in their most likely range (picks 3–10).
Jacksonville Jaguars38 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Jaguars; 93% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 22–30).
San Francisco 49ers38 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the 49ers; 92% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 23–30).
Buffalo Bills37 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Bills; 93% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 21–29).
Kansas City Chiefs36 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Chiefs; 94% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 20–29).
New England Patriots35 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Patriots; 95% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 18–28).
Denver Broncos34 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Broncos; 95% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 16–27).
Baltimore Ravens34 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Ravens; 95% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 16–27).
Chicago Bears34 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Bears; 95% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 17–27).
Cincinnati Bengals32 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Bengals; 97% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 12–24).
Dallas Cowboys32 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Cowboys; 96% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 14–25).
Philadelphia Eagles32 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Eagles; 97% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–24).
Las Vegas Raiders31 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Raiders; 98% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 10–20).
Washington Commanders30 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Commanders; he's almost certain to be available in their most likely range (picks 5–14).
Los Angeles Chargers30 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Chargers; he's almost certain to be available in their most likely range (picks 3–10).
Fit (0–100) combines the team's need at his position (40%), how well his projected range lines up with the team's likely pick (30%) and the chance he's still available there (30%).