QB · LSU
Sam Leavitt
JR · 6'2", 216 lb · SEC · #10
From West Linn, OR
Overall · Week 5
No. 51–
Quarterbacks
No. 8–
Draft range
- Top 5
- 0%
- Top 15
- 2%
- Round 1
- 20%
Projected range: Pick 25–Rd 2 · 80% chance he lasts past round 1
Show as table
| Pick | Chance |
|---|---|
| 6th | <0.1% |
| 7th | <0.1% |
| 8th | <0.1% |
| 9th | <0.1% |
| 10th | 0.1% |
| 11th | 0.2% |
| 12th | 0.4% |
| 13th | 0.4% |
| 14th | 0.3% |
| 15th | 0.6% |
| 16th | 0.6% |
| 17th | 0.6% |
| 18th | 1.0% |
| 19th | 0.6% |
| 20th | 0.8% |
| 21st | 0.9% |
| 22nd | 1.1% |
| 23rd | 0.9% |
| 24th | 1.0% |
| 25th | 1.2% |
| 26th | 1.1% |
| 27th | 1.3% |
| 28th | 1.1% |
| 29th | 1.5% |
| 30th | 1.4% |
| 31st | 1.4% |
| 32nd | 1.4% |
Assumes he enters the 2027 draft. Based on board rank, positional value and team needs, with uncertainty that narrows as the season goes on. How this works
2026 stats
Above average rushing yards among FBS quarterbacks.
- Passer efficiency rating148.859th
- Yards per pass attempt8.874th
- Completion percentage66.262nd
- Passing yards122077th
- Passing touchdowns863rd
- Interceptions thrown7—
- Interception rate5.05th
- Rushing yards22088th
Percentiles compare him with every qualifying FBS player at his position: QB with 14+ pass attempts per team game (133 players). 5 games played.
Next game
at Kentucky
Week 6 · Sat, Oct 10 · 7:00 PM ET
Game log
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Rating | Y/A | Cmp% | Yds | TD | INT | INT% | Rush yds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs  Clemson | W 51–10 | 130.8 | 8.2 | 57.1 | 230 | 1 | 1 | 3.6 | 113 |
| 2 | vs  Louisiana Tech | W 45–14 | 134.7 | 9.1 | 65.8 | 344 | 1 | 3 | 7.9 | 22 |
| 3 | @  Ole Miss | L 24–32 | 113.2 | 5.9 | 59.3 | 158 | 1 | 1 | 3.7 | 63 |
| 4 | vs  Texas A&M | W 35–6 | 207.9 | 13.6 | 73.9 | 312 | 2 | 1 | 4.3 | 22 |
| 5 | vsMcNeMcNeese | W 63–14 | 176.9 | 7.7 | 78.3 | 176 | 3 | 1 | 4.3 | 0 |
Rank history
Ranked No. 51 on the first board of the season. The chart fills in as the board updates each week.
Most likely landing spots
Share of simulated drafts in which each team picks him, combining every team's pick odds, needs and his projected range. He goes after round 1 in 80% of simulations.
Fit with every team
Cleveland Browns72 Strong
Fills the Browns' biggest need at QB; 98% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–20).
Arizona Cardinals70 Strong
Fills the Cardinals' biggest need at QB; he's almost certain to be available in their most likely range (picks 4–12).
New York Jets70 Strong
Fills the Jets' biggest need at QB; he's almost certain to be available in their most likely range (picks 3–7).
Minnesota Vikings65 Strong
QB is a moderate need for the Vikings; 89% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 23–30).
Pittsburgh Steelers65 Strong
Fills a top need for the Steelers at QB; 95% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 12–23).
Miami Dolphins60 Strong
Fills a top need for the Dolphins at QB; he's almost certain to be available in their most likely range (picks 2–9).
All 29 teams with a first-round pick
Atlanta Falcons56 Solid
QB is a moderate need for the Falcons; 95% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–24).
Seattle Seahawks55 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Seahawks; 88% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 23–30).
Carolina Panthers54 Solid
QB is a moderate need for the Panthers; 96% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 9–21).
Tennessee Titans50 Solid
QB is a moderate need for the Titans; he's almost certain to be available in their most likely range (picks 1–5).
Jacksonville Jaguars45 Solid
QB isn't a priority for the Jaguars; 89% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 22–30).
San Francisco 49ers45 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the 49ers; 88% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 23–30).
Detroit Lions45 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Lions; 95% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–23).
New York Giants44 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Giants; 96% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–22).
Buffalo Bills44 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Bills; 90% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 21–29).
Kansas City Chiefs42 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Chiefs; 90% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 20–29).
Houston Texans42 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Texans; 98% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 6–16).
New Orleans Saints41 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Saints; 98% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 5–14).
Tampa Bay Buccaneers41 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Buccaneers; he's almost certain to be available in their most likely range (picks 3–10).
New England Patriots41 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Patriots; 91% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 18–28).
Baltimore Ravens39 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Ravens; 92% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 16–27).
Denver Broncos39 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Broncos; 92% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 16–27).
Chicago Bears39 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Bears; 92% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 17–27).
Dallas Cowboys36 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Cowboys; 94% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 14–25).
Cincinnati Bengals35 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Bengals; 95% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 12–24).
Philadelphia Eagles35 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Eagles; 95% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 11–24).
Las Vegas Raiders33 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Raiders; 97% chance he's available in their most likely range (picks 10–20).
Washington Commanders31 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Commanders; he's almost certain to be available in their most likely range (picks 5–14).
Los Angeles Chargers31 Fair
QB isn't a priority for the Chargers; he's almost certain to be available in their most likely range (picks 3–10).
Fit (0–100) combines the team's need at his position (40%), how well his projected range lines up with the team's likely pick (30%) and the chance he's still available there (30%).